<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Community: E- books for the Dept. of Architecture</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/152" />
  <subtitle>E- books for the Dept. of Architecture</subtitle>
  <id>http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/152</id>
  <updated>2026-04-19T10:24:48Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-19T10:24:48Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>The Seven Lamps of Architecture Lectures on Architecture and Painting :The Study of Architecture</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/154" />
    <author>
      <name>John Ruskin</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/154</id>
    <updated>2018-10-06T04:19:31Z</updated>
    <published>2011-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The Seven Lamps of Architecture Lectures on Architecture and Painting :The Study of Architecture
Authors: John Ruskin
Abstract: The memoranda which form the basis of the following Essay have been thrown together during the&#xD;
preparation of one of the sections of the third volume of "Modern Painters."[A] I once thought of&#xD;
giving them a more expanded form; but their utility, such as it may be, would probably be diminished&#xD;
by farther delay in their publication, more than it would be increased by greater care in their&#xD;
arrangement. Obtained in every case by personal observation, there may be among them some details&#xD;
valuable even to the experienced architect; but with respect to the opinions founded upon them I must&#xD;
be prepared to bear the charge of impertinence which can hardly but attach to the writer who assumes&#xD;
a dogmatical tone in speaking of an art he has never practised. There are, however, cases in which&#xD;
men feel too keenly to be silent, and perhaps too strongly to be wrong; I have been forced into this&#xD;
impertinence; and have suffered too much from the destruction or neglect of the architecture I best&#xD;
loved, and from the erection of that which I cannot love, to reason cautiously respecting the modesty&#xD;
of my opposition to the principles which have induced the scorn of the one, or directed the design of&#xD;
the other. And I have been the less careful to modify the confidence of my statements of principles,&#xD;
because in the midst of the opposition and uncertainty of our architectural systems, it seems to me that&#xD;
there is something grateful in any positive opinion, though in many points wrong, as even weeds are&#xD;
useful that grow on a bank of sand.</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

