<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Community: IEER all digital contents</title>
    <link>http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/465</link>
    <description>IEER all digital contents</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 20:56:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-09-13T20:56:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Experimental Investigation of the Structural  Performance of Inclined Headed Shear Stud in  Steel-Concrete Composite Construction</title>
      <link>http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/571</link>
      <description>Title: Experimental Investigation of the Structural  Performance of Inclined Headed Shear Stud in  Steel-Concrete Composite Construction
Authors: Islam, Md. Seragul
Abstract: In the building industry, steel-concrete composite constructions are becoming &#xD;
more important and popular for sustainable construction. A shear connector is &#xD;
used in steel-concrete composite structures to produce the full composite action &#xD;
between the two materials concrete and steel. The transverse shear that develops &#xD;
at the steel-concrete interface is transferred by the shear connector. The most &#xD;
popular kind of shear connector is headed shear stud, which is typically welded &#xD;
perpendicular to the steel beam's flange surface at a zero angle to the normal of &#xD;
the beam flanges as per current design standards including BS5400, Eurocode 4, &#xD;
CSA S6-14, BNBC-2020, AASHTO LRFD etc. In this study the structural &#xD;
performance of inclined headed shear stud in steel-concrete composite &#xD;
construction has been attempted to be investigated experimentally. 08(eight) test &#xD;
specimen were made at different inclination (0,15,30,45) degree using headed &#xD;
shear stud for investigating of their structural performance. The ultimate shear &#xD;
resistance of the 15, 30, and 45-degree inclined headed shear stud specimen is &#xD;
found to be reduced by 23.38%, 37.57%, and 50.45%, respectively, for inclinations &#xD;
along the direction of loading, in comparison to the perpendicularly oriented &#xD;
headed shear stud. The 15-degree, 30-degree and 45-degree inclined headed &#xD;
shear studs showed ductile behaviour with maximum slip values of 17.58 mm, &#xD;
19.95mm and 16.29 mm; respectively will above the limiting value of 6 mm as &#xD;
suggested by BS5400 for ductile behaviour. Considering the shear resistance &#xD;
capacity, perpendicularly oriented shear stud is found better around 95.31 KN as &#xD;
compared to inclined oriented shear connector. Considering the ductility, &#xD;
inclined headed shear stud showed be their performance with the maximum slip &#xD;
of 19.95mm for 30º inclination.
Description: A Master of Engineering (M.Engg) Thesis in the Institute of Earthquake Engineering Research  at Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology (CUET).</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/571</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-09-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SEISMIC RESPONSES  OF MOMENT RESISTING FRAME AND SHEAR  WALL FRAME SYSTEM</title>
      <link>http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/558</link>
      <description>Title: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SEISMIC RESPONSES  OF MOMENT RESISTING FRAME AND SHEAR  WALL FRAME SYSTEM
Authors: HOSSAIN, MUHAMMED ABUL
Abstract: Rapid urban population growth and land scarcity have significantly impacted the &#xD;
construction of high-rise buildings. Different structural systems can be adopted for &#xD;
high-rise buildings. Different codes recommend dynamic analysis like response &#xD;
spectrum analysis and Time history analysis (THA) for high-rise buildings based on &#xD;
height limits. The choice of structural system and method of structural analysis can be &#xD;
crucial in terms of safety, economy, and usable space area. In this research, two types &#xD;
of building framing systems, the frame shear wall system (FSWS) and the moment &#xD;
resisting frame system (MRFS), are analysed by linear time history approach applying &#xD;
scaled ground motion time histories for a typical site class following the Bangladesh &#xD;
National Building Code (BNBC). These two buildings have the same aspect ratio of &#xD;
1.44, slenderness ratio of 5.77, plan area of 3900 ft2, and height of 300 ft, with different &#xD;
member sections. The column steel percentage for MRFS is 1.2% and FSWS is 1.0%. &#xD;
The two building framing systems are compared through building responses such as &#xD;
story deflection and story drift, which were evaluated in both X and Y directions for &#xD;
scaled ground motion pairs. The research results show that story deflection and story &#xD;
drift for the two framing systems varied for different time history load cases. On the &#xD;
other hand, the usable floor area and concrete volume varied significantly in the two &#xD;
framing systems.
Description: A P.G.D. Thesis in the Institute of Earthquake Engineering Research  (IEER) Department at Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology (CUET).</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/558</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-03-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING FRAMES</title>
      <link>http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/518</link>
      <description>Title: PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING FRAMES
Authors: Rana, Sohel
Abstract: Buildings and other structures must be designed to perform satisfactorily to&#xD;
withstand earthquake, provide safety to human lives, and to minimize the&#xD;
economic losses from the damages, if any. Current code-prescriptive forcebased&#xD;
design intends to provide strength and ductility to structures for life&#xD;
safety, but actual performance is never assessed. Structures designed with a&#xD;
code-based approach experienced extensive damage leading to enormous&#xD;
economic loss and high repairing costs in the past earthquakes (e.g., 1994&#xD;
Northridge and 1995 Kobe earthquake). With a view to enhancing safety and&#xD;
reducing damage, i.e., emphasizing the performance of structures accelerated&#xD;
the development of performance-based seismic design. This study aims at&#xD;
designing reinforced concrete building frames following performance-based&#xD;
earthquake engineering approach. An archetype eight storied RC building has&#xD;
been selected and a frame has been analyzed and designed following the&#xD;
seismic design approach of the BNBC 2020. Nonlinear time history analyses&#xD;
using suitable earthquake ground motion records have been performed to&#xD;
assess the performance of the code designed building frame. The selected&#xD;
ground motions have been matched with acceleration response spectra of&#xD;
required earthquake hazard levels to check the selected performance objectives.&#xD;
Story drift, an indicator of damage, has been selected as an engineering demand&#xD;
parameter to quantify performance. Then, the frame has been designed using&#xD;
the performance based seismic design approach meeting the selected&#xD;
performance objectives. Finally, the effects of base flexibility on the responses of&#xD;
the building in force-based and performance-based design approaches have&#xD;
also been assessed. The present study will help designers, owners, and&#xD;
stakeholders to make intelligent decisions in designing new or strengthening&#xD;
existing buildings to achieve the required performance of the structures.
Description: A Master of Engineering Thesis from the Institute of Earthquake Engineering Research.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/518</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-03-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structural Performance of Inclined Shear Key in Steel- Concrete Composite Construction</title>
      <link>http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/477</link>
      <description>Title: Structural Performance of Inclined Shear Key in Steel- Concrete Composite Construction
Authors: Dey, Rony
Abstract: The use of steel-concrete composite structures is growing in popularity within&#xD;
the construction sector. In steel-concrete composite structure full composite&#xD;
action between steel and concrete is developed using shear connector. Shear&#xD;
connector transfer the transverse shear developed at the interface of steel and&#xD;
concrete. Headed shear stud is the most common type of shear connector which&#xD;
is conventionally welded perpendicularly to the flange surface of the steel beam&#xD;
with zero inclination. Some of the shear connectors unconsciously get welded at&#xD;
an inclined angle during this process. Design equations are not available for&#xD;
inclined shear key in the current design codes like Eurocode 4, CSA S4-14, BNBC-&#xD;
2020, AASHTO LRFD. Here an attempt has been made to investigate the&#xD;
structural performance of inclined shear key in steel-concrete composite&#xD;
construction. A numerical finite element model of push out test of steel-concrete&#xD;
composite structure as per Eurocode is developed using FEA software ANSYS.&#xD;
The developed FE push-out test model for a 19 mm perpendicularly placed&#xD;
headed shear stud is validated and its results are compared with the previous&#xD;
experimental test. The ultimate shear resistance of a perpendicularly welded&#xD;
headed shear stud obtained from FE analysis is found to be very close to that&#xD;
calculated using the BNBC-2020 &amp; AASHTO LRFD recommended design&#xD;
equations. The ultimate shear resistance of 15, 30 &amp; 45-degree inclined headed&#xD;
shear stud is found to be increased by 15 %, 17.33 % &amp; 24 % respectively for the&#xD;
inclination of headed shear stud along the direction of loading and decreased by&#xD;
56 %, 42.57 % &amp; 46.93 % respectively for inclination opposite to the direction of&#xD;
loading. For inclination along the direction of loading, 15-degree &amp; 30-degree&#xD;
inclined Headed shear stud exhibits ductile behaviour with maximum slip value&#xD;
10.79 mm &amp; 7.97 mm respectively but for 45-degree inclination headed shear stud&#xD;
is found to be brittle with maximum slip value 3.95 mm. Headed shear studs are&#xD;
vi&#xD;
found to be brittle for all the angles of inclination opposite to the direction of&#xD;
loading having maximum slip less than 6 mm, which is the Eurocode 4&#xD;
recommended minimum threshold for ductile behaviour. Hence, headed shear&#xD;
stud shall be welded to the flange surface very carefully in steel-concrete&#xD;
composite construction. Only if the direction of loading is known, inclined shear&#xD;
keys may be a better choice for enhanced composite action of steel concrete&#xD;
composite structures.
Description: M. Eng. in Earthquake Eng.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/477</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-06-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

